The argument of whether or not globalization negatively or positively affects cultures in any given nation is a common and quite cited argument in the globalization debate. Presented in this brief detail, will be those arguments suggesting that globalization’s cultural implications are positive ones, and on the opposite end of the spectrum, whether or not globalization’s effects on culture are debilitating and negative.

The Negative: Many protestors over the years have feared that globalization is unifying the world under one cultural umbrella, thus eliminating those rich diverse cultures found within the global environment. To illustrate, they believe that mothers in China will be buying the same jean brand as mothers in Iceland, purchasing them from the same brand-name stores; or that both Icelandic and Chinese families will eventually be eating the same frankenfood as eaten by Canadians in a fast-food restaurant etc. Those diametrically opposed to globalization suggest that much larger and dominant international brand organizations, such as Coca-Cola or McDonald’s, are destroying cultural diversity (predominantly in developing nations,) simply because smaller local companies can not match the product offering and cost savings for their customers much like the aforementioned can. Many opponents even argue that transfer of technology between nations, i.e. Internet, and the global media have been known to reduce cultural diversity in more culturally defined regions of the globe, i.e., First Nations communities.

The Positive: Globalization supporters advocate globalization because they believe that opening up the borders of countries (through free trade initiatives) allows all involved, both directly (companies transacting with one another), and those indirectly (consumers), to profit from the variety of differing skills and circumstances. Trade allows a nation to specialize in producing those goods which they are most efficient in developing. The nation can in turn, trade these goods with other nations for commodities they otherwise have difficulty obtaining in their domestic market. For example through this intricate system of globalization, France can continue to be the world’s leading producer of fine wine. Globalization advocates argue that cultures impacted by globalization are largely reaping the rewards of increased exposure to different cultures, which equate to new forms of music, art, and literature. For example, Picasso would at times draw on African cultures for his paintings and other works.

Which argument is better? It is tough to decide after reading just one account, which outlines the different arguments for and against globalization. Continue reading further into the subject, do your own research, and draw your own conclusions.